separately (from the Logos and) by itself.61 That human nature ‘came into being in the Logos and for (or because of) the Logos and became the flesh of the Logos by union’.62 So, the existence of the Logos’s human nature is grounded in a person: namely, in the Logos’s own person. Karazafeires is right in holding that ‘person then is not the product of nature, but, on the contrary, nature subsists in person and this [the person] is the principle of its existence’.63 There are other ways in which Maximus
Page 111